Category Archives: On Writing

Finishing Touches

Tentatively titled, “I Truly Lament, Working Through the Holocaust,” my latest book of short stories is now undergoing my finishing touches. Using the suggestion of David Herrle who edited the manuscript, I am threading quotations from The i Tetralogy throughout, using each one before a story begins; the quotations sometimes apply significantly to the story, sometimes not. In any case I like the idea. However, as I tramped through the novel choosing quotations I began to experience a kind of despair, for I was again in the camps and that “existence.” I have dedicated the book to Jane, gave special thanks to Herrle for his editing,and cited individual stories that were published prior to publication. Additionally, when all this is arranged properly and formatted I will again go over all the stories for a final editing, rewriting, et al. Jane has all the quotations I’ve listed before her and I am leaving the choice to her; they will serve also as a running commentary on the situations in the manuscript. In many ways, to cite Herrle again, the book is a “sibling” to the tetralogy.

It feels good to have two pregnancies going on, one to be delivered in the fall, and one seeking a father. With the hope that Red Willow Press might take on the book, I am encouraged. I spent a year or so working on both books, “This Mobius Strip of Ifs,” and Lament and it was invigorating, moving from non-fiction to fiction. Although I will be tinkering with my latest effort until it is accepted, I am already thinking about what I may do next. The idea of having, the fantasy of having four books on the shelf with my name pleases me no end. If my health holds out, I will continue to pump out from the cellar all the collective unconscious waters I have pooled together since my biological inception. I am thinking about a book of my relationship as a reader with Krishnamurti theses past thirty-six years, what I have learned, what I have not learned about my place in this world of no consequence except for the natural beauty it provides us and that we don’t rarely see. The passage of time, for me, is a kind of soft acid that scours myself, what was done, what was not done and the more than shattering sensibility of what I am not doing at this moment to avail myself of what there is out there. Writing is only one way I can recompense myself, for thought means much too me, the buck means nothing, except to feed my face and to get by.

In fact, as I reflect on what I am writing I associate to the realization that I’m at a passage in life in which I am applying my finishing touches. It has not been a life well led. All my books are a metaphor for my attempt to assuage myself as I head out to the far-ranging galaxies, incipient stellar soot. It is more than my scratch in the sand declaring that I was here, like Kilroy. It does have a smattering of that, so not to deceive myself. I really get clearer in mind the more and more convincingly I write to myself about what cares and concerns and mostly, passions, I have in this existence. It makes nonsense objectively. It makes very much sense to me. I have chosen to state what and who I am as I travel this arc. No one will record me. I record and observe myself. At least a third of my life was occuptied by an empty self until I came alive or better said, aware, in my thirties, so figuratively I was born twice, one a stillborn, the other a lively neonate.

Galloping along in my seventies, it is ironic for me to sense how long it has taken to excell, to create without self-imposed censors, to be free somewhere in my soul, to have been deconditioned by my own hands, to have left a societal slavery so that I can be subversive in my creativity. As I look about me, as I draw in the atmosphere of this demented culture, as rage spewers from politicians I distance myself more and more from this pollution. If I had my druthers, as I look back, I would “educate” each young student to run away, like Huck, to the river, away from the civilizing conditioning of a ruinous society. When men come together, when they form clots and groupings, the soul withers, as I look back. Young people have taken to rooms, to texting, to computering, to an absorption with the cyber world which in itself is isolating and dehumanizing. In fantasy give me a wooden shoe so that I can smash all things high-tech in an Apple store.

Technology has run amuck. See for yourself. Any children playing outside in the neighborhood of late? Most if not all gaming is indoors, alas.

The last finishing touch will be what I do with my life as it nears its close. I haven’t the slightest clue as to how I will intervene with my own life to give it a worth I wish it to have. In fact I haven’t been too successful with this except for my writing, that which I inscribe for myself to see, to visit and revisit, as if a wonderment, a display I have made for my own edification.

At This Time

At this time I am preparing a bio for my book, “This Mobius Strip of Ifs,” for the publisher Chris O’Byrne of Red Willow Digital Press. When all this is submitted in addition to two summaries of the book for the back cover, I suppose, or for advertising as an Ebook and print version, it will be published. So over this weekend Jane and I are both scrambling to get everything in order for the publisher’s once over. The art of writing, for me, has always been the art of revision, to keep saying more by saying less, by thinking thin, or by shaving close. And so summaries and bio are being scrupulously reviewed and edited. While all this is going on, here I am in my early seventies pressed to managed a whole lot of writing, some in real time and some coalescing in my noggin.

An almost completed book of short stories, “I Truly Lament, Working Through the Holocaust,” terrifically edited by my pal, poet David Herrle, is being subjected to my final wringing out of the prose — sequencing stories, writing additional lines here and there, deleting paragraphs or lines so that the pace is a good canter rather than a leisurely trot. Jane will help me in ways I know not of the computer to format this and that, to rearrange the table of contents, to space, and all that sweet stuff that makes one’s words look splendid on the page, printed or not. I am excited over the fantasy that 2011-2012 might see two books published — hurrah for being 71! No golf for me. Books to the end of time, of life.

Everyday I walk for exactly one hour at a reasonable pace, sometimes jogging an old’s man’s jog. I think of the flic I saw last night, “Cowboys and Indians,” with Daniel Craig and Harrison Ford, now in his late sixities. Craig turns to Ford, who still has his mojo, and says “Old, man” to him. Oh, Oh has time flown by! Craig, by the way, steals the movie, bony, sinewy, fast, quick, sleekly put together — Jane likes his ass. I mention this for I am quite tuned in or sensitive to the passage of time which is dealt with in essays in the above book now nearing publication — tempus fugit. So while walking for an hour a day to fight off plaque buildup in my other carotid artery, I think of all kinds of things, especially writing tasks to be accomplished in the near future as well as my psychological stirrings of what next. Like an impatient child, I can’t wait to propose the Holocaust stories to O’Byrne as my next effort, for it is a powerhouse of a book, a “sibling,” Herrle has called it, to The i Tetralogy.

Although Jane and I had a humorous chat about how I can walk for an hour without a device in my ear to endure the tediousness of exercise, I stated that I think, or that I am not empty and do not require Muzak piped in, although I am moving on that front and will factor in some Debussy, Borodin, et al if I can. While I walk I think of the next book and plot out in mind how it will be divided, or what are the sections to be. In the past I would come up with the first sentence and then devise the last sentence of the book with the idea that I would drive my energies across this arc, until like Robin Hood’s arrow, I hit the bull’s-eye. The next book will be about Eastern thought as I have experienced it in the West with the main focus on Krishnamurti (see the last blog). I intend to fabricate parts of it as if I had met the spiritual teacher who died in 1986. I had a chance to do so but money issues prevented me. It would be a kind memoir of my struggle with his teachings, rather his testimonies, over the decades. I first came across him in a social work class, “How People Change,” in 1975.

What I am intending to do is to reflect upon my interactions with Krishnaji as I read his books over the decades. Perhaps it will be suigeneris, reflecting upon how this spiritual teacher impacted upon a secular Jewish atheist, what I took from his teachings, rather, his questioning. I am enthralled more by the question than by the dead-end — the answer. I have always been attracted to Eastern thought or what has been called the perennial wisdom. And in Krishnamurti I found the bottomless well of being. I wrestled and haggled and angered and bridled with his teaching. Often I would leave his writings for years and eventually I returned to drink from the well when in anxiety or facing personal issues of intensity, more seeking in his questions what to ask of myself rather than to acquire answers, which he decidedly never gives, the genius of his teachings.

So, the task, I think, is to write about my involvement with his writings stemming from 1975 and what if anything I have garnered from them. Or, is it all a low-key infatuation with a mind that I cannot fathom too well but I know, on many levels,  is a remarkable mind that offers me what I would call wisdom? As I said in an essay in “This Mobius Strip of Ifs,” I have a liking for the transcendental and then I went on that I would like to write a book in that field. I can’t wait to sink into it, to freely write about this romance I have had for at least thirty-six years. I know that at least one chapter will be my feeble attempt to state what I have learned from Krishnaji. It may be a blank page. I wonder about all that.

So as I do my laps tomorrow at the gym, I continue to  plot, think out, and concoct my next book. I have written about K over the years and even wrote short pieces about him which I think, at least for now, i will incorporate into my next effort. You know, dear reader, at this time in my life nothing holds me back as I write: I have no expectations, I have no fears…I am free, to paraphrase Kazantzakis’ epitaph, who by the way, was an intimate of Krishnamurti. All the great minds get to know one another, for they are the caul of mankind.

Red Willow Digital Press…And Will I Make It

About a week ago Chris O’Byrne, publisher, emailed me to say he would be “honored” to publish the manuscript he had in hand, “This Mobius Strip of Ifs,” an anthology/compilation of essays written over three decades. “Honored” stood out for me as that is not exactly publisher lingo. When I shared my surprise with him in a follow up note, he told me that my writing was “impressive.” So before any contract is signed I have been nourished as to my capacity as a writer. I had spent maybe a year going over the selection of the essays, proofing them, rearranging them, for sequence, I have learned, is essential in laying out a book of short stories or essays, among other writerly things.

I had planned to self-publish the book but submitted the manuscript after reading about his press in an email sent out to writers by Harvey Stanbrough, poet. I had no expectations whatsoever; indeed, after this try I would go out and get it published by myself. Serendipitously, not looking for a publisher and having one suggested to me led to all this personal excitement.

It has been two weeks since last O’Byrne wrote me, saying that after a conference he was at ended he would forward contracts to me. I have not received them only throwing doubt into the pot and I have decided to give him until the end of the month before I respond. He moves, as we all do, in his own time. Since this is the first time I have been accepted for publication, delays create all kinds of mischief in mind, given that there is a whole slew of questions I need ask as to editing, publication date, cover  and format. However, I’ve had two books percolating and on track for the last year. I just sent off for editing, “Working Through the Holocaust,” my final say on the Holocaust through short stories, of which eight have been published (!) in 2010. David Herrle, editor of Subtletea.com,. and a poet in his own right, will take on the editorial task as he is sympatico with my style and themes. It has been a creative year or so, the first for me in that I was working on two different kinds of books. If my health holds out, I may see four books published in a decade — The i Tetralogy, Down to a Sunless Sea, This Mobius Strip of Ifs, and Working Through the Holocaust. Two books of short stories, one major novel and a book of essays.

While this was going on I discovered medically that plaque had built up in my carotid artery to the degree I am at risk and there is an issue with my heart, all brought about by my inability to lose weight and my high blood sugar countas a pre-diabetic. It isn’t that I haven’t tried to maintain my health, but the dice have been tossed and I am losing out. Not only are we abstractly terminal, but I have been given notice that I, personally, Mathias B. Freese, am terminal, like Luther’s theses nailed to the church’s wooden door. Don’t ask how I am doing? I don’t know. Are you depressed? I don’t know. What floats through my consciousness is the time given to me, although I am doing everything medically — pills, tests and more tests, losing weight at Weight Watchers, working out three times weekly at a local gym with a trainer — in order to lose the weight. I am told that meds will ease or attentuate the situation, but that losing weight may very well alleviate or reverse it all. The task is mine alone. What status is there to know you now have a cardiologist on your team?

I am surprised I’m not in a corner fetally mewling. I suppose after Rochelle’s death and Caryn’s suicide some part of me doesn’t give a shit and some part of me wants to see the next day — you know, just futzing about. I am not scared, but alarmed; I kid the doctor and others about my imminent demise, but that is solely defensive, like raising your hands before your face when dad wants to wallop you one. I am trying to fight back but the news this week has me somewhat addled, befuddled and saddened by a life not without some honor but nevertheless one that has been unsuccessful, whatever that means. Well, it means the standards I have held for myself have shifted over the years and are more stringent yet more compassionate. I am less than what I could have been, so saith the stalk of wheat as the scythe cuts it down. I wish I had been a better father. I was good husband. My son and daughter know me not. I cannot access their true selves.  It is a kind of parental failure, I believe, on my part. I grieve more about that than I do about my diagnosis which is not too good.

I don’t think I am scared, but somewhat morose; I don’t perseverate over the whys and why nots, but feel this is all part of the plan that began with my birth. Jane is stalwart, optimistic and she fills up my glass which is always half empty; no, she is not Mary Poppins but gives me a fair optimism to combat my general darkness. I have told her, quite melodramatically, but seriously, if it all goes south, to make sure the next two books are published. Whether they will be read or not, who cares. They represent me, come from the loins of my mind and that is essential to whom I am. They are patrimony whether children or not read them. They are the product of a hard birth.

So, Red Willow Digital Press, act more quickly. I would like to see my first published book before I croak.

Why I Write — Cliche Question, I Feel

“Sincerely, Max Weber,” was just published on line at www.servinghousejournal.com. It is the eighth short story I’ve had accepted in about eight months. Just yesterday Ascent Aspirations informed me that “Freud in Auschwitz” wil appear in its July issue. These stories are in my work in progress. “Working Through the Holocaust.” The acceptances might help me get a publisher when it is done. In any case I am elated by the good fortune of it all. While I was walking about an indoor track about half an hour ago, I began to think about this blog and what I would write. It is in shape before me and I will begin with why I write. Since I began blogging about three years ago, I recall in my introduction I told you, the reader, that this blog is for me and that if you found it of interest, so be it. I still take that position.

I write to define myself. I write to know. And I write for my children to remember, a great fortune indeed.

Given my childhood, those latency years, I internalized the world, incorporated it without having the tools to make sense of it, to metabolize what was occurring or had occurred. I had all the grain in the world and I had no grist mill. I wish there had been grist for the mill. Defining who I was did not really occur until I awoke in my early thirties. I was asleep in life. Some of us never wake up and go to our graves uninformed about who we are. Look about you, they are everywhere, they are family and friends, the world at large. My first major story, “Herbie,” which finally appeared in a collection, Down to a Sunless Sea in 2008 was originally published in 1974 and was listed as a distinctive short story in The Best American Short Stories of 1975, edited by Martha Foley who had edited some works of Hemingway and others. It was quite an honor; years later I paid testament to her in an essay, “To Miss Foley, With Gratitude,” which won first prize as personal essay/memoir by the Society of Southwestern Authors in 2005.

And so my writing “career” began. I began in my vigorous thirties, knowing nothing about the craft, spending years becoming an auto-didact with all the defects of that posture and was finally rewarded in my sixties with the publication of a novel and a book of short stories. I am a turtle, the one behind the turtle in the fable. I was a bright, perhaps intelligent child who was reared in the soup of benign neglect, never drawn out, rarely engaged, turning inward like a withered leaf, believing I was cold or undemonstrative because I had the inability to express what I felt or knew. I was inhibited, shy, inexpressed. I was not felt as a child. And so serendipitously writing allowed me to begin a lifelong dialogue with all the selves I had within and by doing that I slowly discovered how to define myself in words, images, metaphors and finally I began to bud, then blossom. Writing drew me out of the husk. I defined myself through self-definition. Much of a lesson in that for me and the lesson still goes on like a raving madman running nude across a hill.

To define one self is to know one self. I have learned about me as I wrote over the decades. I was shaped by my writing, and writing shaped me. I learned that “knowledge is death,” that awareness, real, deconditioned awareness, shatters all systems, causes, beliefs, religions; that to know brings a stoical perspective, an awareness of the fragility of life, the sorrow relationships bring us and yet we must relate; it shoves death,like a grapefruit, into our face. I no longer search for meaning in things; I think that is a mistake, also a kind of conditioned thought. Rather, I prefer to be aware, if at all. For over thirty years I have read the master who felt that to have disciples is an abomination.

Krishnamurti has provoked me to know myself like any great ancient Greek. In our presently consitituted society we market ourselves, consequently we can never know ourselves, for we are merchandise, wampum to exchange. Insight cowers and hides in this nation. No phony American will accept that knowledge is death; rather, knowledge is power, something to be used, or inflicted upon man and nature. An aware human being does not need to be empowered! Awareness is the capacity to see that has nothing to do with grasping ends and possessions. And so I write for it brings me a sense and sensibility that allows knowing.

Finally, I write to be remembered, for that is a sweet delicacy I may or may not attain. What is left to all of us except the thought, the possibility that after we are gone those who cared and loved us while here will cherish our impact. A cemetery cannot do that. A cemetery is for the living, a reminder. What is best is to have our kin and kith to recall us to mind, for in that remembrance of things past affection and love are expressed.

For me it comes down to a fantasy. I imagine about 300 to 500 people in an auditorium, filled with friends, new acquaintances, strangers, concerned men and women who have come to have me speak about my books. I not there to sell books or sell them anything. I am there to be in colloquy. The pleasure, for me, would to be in relationship with these folks, to share my life’s work, to hear pro and con, to be stretched by new ideas that my ideas have provoked. I write not for the buck, never have, never will. I write to give — so unAmerican. The cosmic and eternal joke is on me — all this will be forgotten; ha! in the interim I have played my own game,irrelevant for all time and to those who come after. Perhaps life is a monstrous distraction, like playing golf, retirement, greed, or comb overs on Trump’s head.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...